Brathwaite sparkles on rain-curtailed day

ESPNcricinfo staff24-Oct-2015Angelo Mathews showed why the P Sara Oval was one of his favourite grounds as he started to settle in•AFPMilinda Siriwardana added 67 for the fifth wicket with Mathews to stabilise the Sri Lankan innings, but was dismissed by Kraigg Brathwaite in the 56th over•AFPBrathwaite started to get more out of the pitch and quickly ran through Sri Lanka’s middle order and tail, completing his first Test five-wicket haul•AFPBlackwood took his fifth catch of the innings and Brathwaite his sixth wicket when Nuwan Pradeep was dismissed for a first-ball duck. It set West Indies a target of 244 to level the series•AFPDhammika Prasad struck early to send Brathwaite back in the ninth over before rain forced an early end to the day•AFP

Tearaway Chameera takes the Test by the scruff

After trying hard to get his captain’s attention, Dushmantha Chameera turned the Test in Sri Lanka’s favour with a weapon not usually associated with Sri Lanka’s bowlers – the bouncer

Andrew Fidel Fernando in Hamilton19-Dec-2015All through the series, Dushmantha Chameera has been trying to get Angelo Mathews’ attention. He seems to know he is not trusted with the new ball yet. But maybe, he feels, he deserves the first-change role. During the early overs in Dunedin, and for much of day two’s first session in Hamilton, Chameera was seen warming up extravagantly in the infield, throwing a windmill arm into Mathews’ field of vision, kicking a scarecrow leg up in his direction. When that failed, he stared his captain down, hoping maybe to catch a stray glance.Even by this team’s standards Chameera is a junior player, so he can’t really demand the ball. What else could he do? Set off a vine of firecrackers at deep point? Hire an old-timey town crier to shout his case?As the quickest bowler on show from either team, Chameera has also had the crowd’s interest. So many would have wondered why he wasn’t being brought on earlier that Chameera could have begun a petition, collected thousands of signatures, then fed it all to a goat, because, frankly, there seemed to be no way Mathews was letting him anywhere near the new ball this series. On Saturday, Rangana Herath bowled an over before Chameera did.Ball finally in hand in the 21st, Chameera leaks 13 runs while he settles his sights. By the second over in his spell, the legs are pumping. The speeds have climbed. Tom Latham, fresh from a ton in Dunedin, sees the leg slip and short gully. He is prepared for the bouncer, yet the ball still comes roaring at him. The fifth delivery would have flattened his grille, had he not ducked beneath it. The next one, into the ribs at 142kph, is fended to that leg gully. The batsman seems a little hapless in that stroke, but people don’t take much notice of the quality of the bowling just yet. It is just another unfulfilled Latham start for now.When Kane Williamson falls, you start to wonder. His hook shot in Chameera’s next over climbs high. It settles in deep square leg’s hands. The openers had put on a relatively relaxed 81, but suddenly, there is life in this Test. Martin Guptill falls at the other end. Then Ross Taylor gets a monster. It might be the ball of the series, lifting sharply from short of a good length, hurrying into his personal space. The best Taylor can do is push at it in front of his nose. The deflection off the glove is snaffled up. Chameera seems like the kind of person who would apologise profusely if he bumped you in a queue, but he is charged up in Hamilton, happily hurling balls at people’s heads. He is taking the Test by the scruff.’SL used the short ball well’- Guptill

The Hamilton surface may be drier than it appears, and may become conducive to reverse swing and spin later in the game, Martin Guptill said. Only two of the 19 wickets to fall in this Test have gone to a spin bowler, but Hamilton surfaces have been known to take turn in the past.
“I think the pitch was a little bit drier underneath than what everyone thought,” he said. “Out there batting today there were a few footmarks starting to show up. They’ll come into play in days four and five. Hopefully the boys can rough it up a bit and get Mitchell Santner bowling into those footmarks.
“I noticed on the TV they started to get a bit of reverse swing out there today, and that can come into our hands as well. The new ball is still going to have a bit of bounce in it.”
Guptill said Sri Lanka had used the short ball well, and expected them to do so again in the second innings. All five of Dushmantha Chameera’s wickets came from short balls.
“You look at Sri Lanka and say they spin you out rather than bowl you out, but Chameera bowled very well today,” he said. “I’m sure they will introduce that short-pitched bowling again at some point in the next innings. We will have to be on top our game to counter that and get through it.”

“Kane Williamson’s was the wicket I was happiest with, because I think he’s the best batsman in New Zealand,” Chameera later said. “When we started bowling we realised there was pace and bounce, so we just thought we’d unsettle the batsmen that way and get a wicket. I think we were successful with the bouncer.”All day, no batsman could play him confidently. Brendon McCullum had run at Chameera and carved the ball for six in Dunedin. Here he was turned into a series of upright, evasive spasms. Another bowler would eventually get him out, but Chameera had first bullied him into reticence. McCullum was 7 off 34 balls at one point; 18 from 54 when he got out.Then a long anticlimax. An hour passed after Chameera’s first-seven over spell. The tea break came and went, and still, there was no sign of him. When two hours had gone by, fans around the world became impatient on social media. On the field, Mathews seemed to have forgotten Chameera existed. The bowler went through his attention-seeking warm-up routine again. He stretched, he lunged, he waved his arms. He tried everything for a second time in the day – except maybe take his trousers off and swing them above his head.When Chameera was given the ball again – to bowl the 69th over – the Hamilton crowd was merely piqued. Had the Test match been in Colombo, tears of joy would have broken out, and everybody would have put on party hats. Chameera gave away a few quick runs, of course, but the wickets came just as quickly. Tim Southee top-edged another ball to fine leg. Neil Wagner slapped an off-side snorter to cover.It is a strange thing to ponder. A Sri Lankan tearaway turning an overseas Test? Most words in that sentence seem wrong. And each of his five wickets were from bouncers. Are Sri Lankans even allowed to do that?Someone should tell Chameera that Sri Lankan pacemen have found their feet in New Zealand before. Chaminda Vaas did it in 1995. Lasith Malinga had a breakthrough Test in Napier. Whether Chameera will be remembered as one of Sri Lanka’s greatest – like Vaas – or burn brightly and briefly – like Malinga – may be decided by his fitness over long Test seasons.But maybe it’s too soon to think of any of that. For now, a lot hinges on whether Mathews will ever bloody give the guy the ball.

Raina on notice, Dhawan given backing

Five talking points from the India squads named for the upcoming limited-overs tour to Australia

Sidharth Monga20-Dec-2015

The ODI squad

Shikhar Dhawan has been shown immense faith. Not in that he has been picked in the squad – the argument against picking him would be only one fifty in his last 13 international innings – but in the fact that there are only five established specialist batsmen in the ODI squad. Already we are looking at either Gurkeerat Mann or Manish Pandey getting a decent run at No. 6, but what if Dhawan continues to fail? There is no back-up. On all of his last three tours outside Asia, Dhawan had to be dropped. He was left out in the ODIs in New Zealand, and Tests in England and Australia. To be fair to him, though, Dhawan came back with runs in Tests in New Zealand, the ODIs in England and the World Cup in Australia.Suresh Raina has been served notice. What should disturb Raina more is that this is not a form issue. That there are still question marks over his quality after 223 ODIs and two World Cups. There is a certain ruthlessness to this move. As if the selectors are saying, “We know you are great in the field, we know you chip in with the ball, we know you are selfless when it comes to your batting order, but where are the runs? Consistent runs. Against a relatively bigger pool of opposition in relatively varied conditions.” Raina responded well to such an ultimatum, when he came back from his axe last year with a century in England, but will he keep getting that second chance again and again?From the selectors’ point of view, the decision would have been made easier by the fact that the big ODI events – Champions Trophy and World Cup – are not around the corner. It gives time to a newcomer to bed in, and also for Raina to scream out for another chance by scoring runs elsewhere.The presence of R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja gives India a bowling comfort zone and some depth in batting•AFP

The T20 squad

The kind of selection where you want to be proved wrong. He is 34 years old. When he was 30, he was the face of India’s World Cup win. At 26, he did it for them in the T20 format. Those are the memories you want to remember Yuvraj Singh by. Not the cruel rotten last international he played, a struggling match-losing 11 off 21 in the World T20 final in Dhaka last year. You don’t want him exposed to any more of that. Ironically the only plausible reason to get him back is to play the role he failed to do in Dhaka: hit big from ball one, a game the other established batsmen in that order struggle to play.Yuvraj has been picked ahead of Shreyas Iyer, who is young and has seemed a cut above the other batsmen in domestic cricket this season. Then again, there is still a lot of time and matches to go before the World T20, which is the ultimate focus of these selections. And there is a youngster in the squad – Hardik Pandya – who can be asked to play a similar role.The selectors seem to recognise there is no long-term in T20 cricket. Take your punts. If the guy is the right-shaped plug for the hole right now, hammer it in. Ashish Nehra is not going to be around for too long, that much is known, but in a four-over game he has shown in the IPL that he can do a job with his experience and yorkers. He gives India the left-arm option that they lack. This is a gamble, but this is a gamble with little to lose. For what were the young Indian quicks doing before Nehra? They can get back to doing the same should Nehra fail in Australia. Not many will have missed that.

Overall selection

India’s bowling comfort zone is back. R Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja and Mohammed Shami give India a comfort zone. Since the start of the tri-series in Australia last year, India have been without their bowling comfort zone in limited-overs cricket. Jadeja was injured and then dropped; Shami was spectacular in the World Cup but injured and hence out ever since. At their best, Shami, Jadeja and Ashwin provide India 30 overs of control and incision. The presence of Jadeja and Ashwin at nos 7 and 8 gives MS Dhoni the freedom to play his shots and pull the trigger suitably early. The three are part of the same squad again; if they are at their best, India could revive their limited-overs fortunes dramatically.

Nabi's magic touch subsides Hong Kong challenge

ESPNcricinfo staff10-Mar-2016Mohammad Nabi helped Afghanistan claw back by dismissing Campbell and Babar Hayat in the space of two deliveries•Christopher Lee-IDI/IDIWith two experienced batsmen gone, Mark Chapman had the responsibility to guide Hong Kong, but he was bowled off a superb yorker by Gulbadin Naib•Christopher Lee-IDI/IDIAnshuman Rath’s industry, an unbeaten 31-ball 28 helped Hong Kong squeeze past 100. They finished with 116 for 8•AFP/Getty ImagesMohammad Nabi and Noor Ali Zadran wiped out 43 in six overs as Afghanistan were in cruise control•Getty ImagesBut Afghanistan gave away a series of wickets to take the gloss off their chase, before Gulbadin Naib steered them home with two overs to spare•Getty ImagesMohammad Nabi, who returned best figures by an Afghanistan bowler in T20Is (4 for 20) was named Man of the Match•Getty Images

Nabi's magic touch subsides Hong Kong challenge

ESPNcricinfo staff10-Mar-2016Mohammad Nabi helped Afghanistan claw back by dismissing Campbell and Babar Hayat in the space of two deliveries•Christopher Lee-IDI/IDIWith two experienced batsmen gone, Mark Chapman had the responsibility to guide Hong Kong, but he was bowled off a superb yorker by Gulbadin Naib•Christopher Lee-IDI/IDIAnshuman Rath’s industry, an unbeaten 31-ball 28 helped Hong Kong squeeze past 100. They finished with 116 for 8•AFP/Getty ImagesMohammad Nabi and Noor Ali Zadran wiped out 43 in six overs as Afghanistan were in cruise control•Getty ImagesBut Afghanistan gave away a series of wickets to take the gloss off their chase, before Gulbadin Naib steered them home with two overs to spare•Getty ImagesMohammad Nabi, who returned best figures by an Afghanistan bowler in T20Is (4 for 20) was named Man of the Match•Getty Images

Calm Harmanpreet ready for must-win challenge against West Indies

The aggressive India allrounder has faced World Cup disappointment before. But things are different this time, she says

Shashank Kishore26-Mar-2016When Harmanpreet Kaur put down a sitter, a full toss hit straight to her at cover, with England at 88 for 8 in the 19th over and needing three runs to beat India in the Women’s World T20 match in Dharamsala, a sprinkling of fans, who had given up on Mithali Raj’s team pulling off a shock upset, only to sit up in disbelief at the challenge mounted by the team, wondered if Kaur had dropped the cup. Never mind the two wickets she took off successive deliveries to give India a sniff in the first place.Kaur, of course, was disappointed, maybe even shocked for a split second at just how she had grassed it, but remained admirably composed even as the rest of her team rallied around her after the match and trudged off knowing they had given it their best. While there weren’t any -type (Culprit of the Match) analysis shows, Kaur’s dropped chance was replayed a fair few times. With each new showing, the same question popped up over and over again.And just like that, it was 2013 all over again – when India crashed out of the World Cup in the first round after a shocking loss to Sri Lanka. Except that, this time around, the doors are not fully shut just yet.Kaur will remember 2013 for different reasons, however. At the Brabourne Stadium, she made a century that briefly sparked talk of her taking over the baton from Mithali Raj, clearly the team’s best batsman for the better part of the last decade and a half. Kaur had just brought up her maiden one-day century in trying circumstances against a fired-up England attack that was demolishing batting line-ups the world over. While India lost that match narrowly, Kaur remained unconquered, if heartbroken.And so when she walks out to play West Indies in Mohali, her home ground, on Sunday, Kaur will have an opportunity to erase the pain of that defeat and memories of her dropped catch. India need a win at any cost. They also need England to beat Pakistan in order to qualify for the semis.Despite two losses, the fact that India are still in with a chance is testament to the team’s self-belief. Not too many India Women teams would have come out and defended 96 and 90 like they did against Pakistan and England. Sure, the pitches were slow, low, and helped India’s spinners, but for them to make those games a fight was heartening.

“I took a while to gel and feel free with the seniors. I didn’t want the youngsters to feel that way, so that when I’m captain few years down the line, there’s a rapport”

“When you keep losing, you tend to get frustration. But now, everyone’s talking about winning, which was missing before,” Kaur says, when asked to pick out the difference between the teams of the past and the current crop. “There was a lot of self-doubt back then. Today, when we leave in the bus, all the talk is about us winning, not just competing. Before, we used to get overawed by names, overawed by teams. Now we’ve moved out of our comfort zone, we’re starting to read the game well, so that has made a big difference.”When I first came in, there were a lot of changes within the team. Players weren’t getting time to settle down. Unless you understand the strengths and weaknesses of your team-mates, you won’t be able to gel together. Now, for a while, the same group has been playing together. We understand each other’s game better. Back then, we didn’t know who we had to go to at the slog, who we could open with. Everything starts with the dressing room. Once we have started doing that, we have been progressing.”Kaur followed up a Player-of-the-Match performance against Bangladesh with a laboured 29-ball 16 against Pakistan, unable to hit it off the square before perishing to a slog. But against England, she top-scored with 26; the next best was 20 by Tammy Beaumont.Kaur is aware of the need to change her style of play in a young batting line-up, where she is one of the calmer heads. She knows there is so much more scrutiny and accountability today because of central contracts. While she has retained the belligerence her game has always been associated with, there’s a calmer side to her now, one of a finisher who has had to curb her style of play, as seen in January in Adelaide, where India recorded their highest T20 chase and set the tone for their first series win against Australia.Kaur (right) with Veda “the Don” Krishnamurthy•IDI/Getty ImagesIn that match, Kaur started slowly and finished with an unbeaten 31-ball 46. The innings earned her plaudits even from the opposition. Alyssa Healy, the Australia wicketkeeper, went so far as to say that India taught them how to play in that game. It wasn’t easy for Kaur, for she hadn’t scored a single fifty across formats in 2015.A ten-day stint with coach Harshal Pathak in Mumbai, where she lives now since being employed by Western Railways, helped clear the cobwebs.”Earlier, I would be appreciated for whatever little bit I could chip in with. Now, being the senior player, I don’t have that choice to not score,” she explains. “The team heavily depends on your form. One of the top four has to play the anchor role. On days when the top order collapses, my role and my game changes. I am expected to bat patiently and stay till the end.”Reporters often compare me to [Virat] Kohli, in terms of my batting style and where I bat. He was my favourite player back then, he still is, but now I admire Ajinkya Rahane. Aggressive but life calmness. [I’m aggressive, everyone knows that, but you need some calmness in life as well],” she laughs.”Recently we were at the Bandra Kurla Complex in Mumbai. Rahane was practising for a Test against South Africa, and for three hours he was leaving the ball, even if it was at a drivable length. I can’t remember him playing one ball. Usually when we train, even if our coach asks us to leave, we instinctively tend to play, so I learnt a lot from him that day. If you decide on something, you need to achieve it come what may.”Her focus and goals, Kaur says, were shaped by her life in Moga, a small town in Punjab, where she grew up. Driving to an academy 30km away from her house to train, she says, made her realise the importance of being dedicated to her craft. But it was a move to Mumbai in 2014 that transformed her outlook.”It wasn’t tough to leave Punjab, purely from a cricketing point of view, but my early days in Mumbai were tough. I wanted to come back home, but Diana Edulji [the former India captain, and then a Western Railways colleague] kept telling me, you shouldn’t give up easily. Living away from home in a big city has also changed my outlook towards cricket. It has made me a better person.”

“Today, all the talk is about us winning, not just competing. Before, we used to get overawed by names, overawed by teams”

As Kaur speaks, a few players mill around the lobby of the hotel. Some for a snack, others shopping. There are half-taunts aimed at Kaur, teasing her for being a “big person”, giving interviews.Kaur says this India team has a lot of pranksters in it. ” [Veda Krishnamurthy] , she is a dominating girl,” Kaur chuckles. “But both of us, along with Sushma Verma, push the other girls to not feel shy. If you are free in the dressing room, you will be free on the field. I want them all to enjoy like we do. If you’re shy and reserved, it shows on the field too. So we want to create an atmosphere where everyone is friendly. If you don’t talk, you don’t really know what the person is going through. We try to keep the atmosphere light.”Everyone tells me I should be taking responsibility going forward. Of course, there is Mithali , but I try to ensure everyone mingles with everyone, so the youngsters don’t have any apprehensions when they approach the seniors. I want to be friendly with all. The first step towards that is to call everyone by name – it helps break the ice. I took a while to gel and feel free with the seniors. I didn’t want the youngsters to feel that way, so that when I’m captain few years down the line, there’s a rapport.”All the off-field efforts will be put to a severe test on Sunday. A slip-up against West Indies and it will be 2013 all over again. Kaur saw her World Cup hopes go up in smoke then. There’s hope now, but also the expectation of a special performance from her in familiar surroundings. If she can put aside the pressure and be calm, she can leave her imprint at a venue she calls home.

Amla, Stoinis and an over of bloopers

Plays of the day from the IPL match between Kings XI Punjab and Delhi Daredevils in Mohali

Shashank Kishore07-May-2016Morris’ recovery
Chris Morris started poorly, with his first two deliveries straying down leg and going to the fine-leg boundary. He corrected his line and length in his second over by bowling full and straight to M Vijay, who was trying to heave all the deliveries that came his way. Off the second ball off his second over, Morris got one to tail back in slightly and Vijay could only get a thick inside-edge off an attempted pick-up shot. A ball later, Vijay got another inside edge, this time lobbing towards Carlos Brathwaite, who threw himself to his right at midwicket to pluck a one-handed catch. And Morris had made up for his early lapses.The miscommunication(s)
Hashim Amla’s first ball on IPL debut was farcical. He pushed a short ball towards cover, and took a couple of steps outside the crease. That was enough for Marcus Stoinis to be convinced that there was a run. He was more than halfway down the pitch when Amla sent him back. A direct hit from Morris, who sprinted to his left to collect the ball, would have made it two in two for Daredevils. That seemed to set the tone for the rest of Amla’s brief innings. Stoinis swiped the first ball of the next over, bowled by Shahbaz Nadeem, to deep square leg and there was drama again. Stoinis was firm on a second, but Amla didn’t respond. A sharp throw at the bowler’s end followed, but Nadeem failed to collect the ball in his eagerness to break the bails. Stoinis wasn’t even in the frame. Off the next delivery, Amla punched the ball towards mid-on, but Nadeem swiftly moved to his right to produce a diving save. Amla was nearly at the bowler’s end when he was sent back by Stoinis, who was ball-watching. Nadeem had done everything right except collect the ball, though, and another run-out opportunity was missed.Third time unlucky
Four balls later, Amla had clearly exhausted his lives as he was run out by a sharp throw from Zaheer Khan at backward point. Searching for a single, he was once again sent back and had to stretch back into the crease, by which time Quinton de Kock had collected the ball and whipped the bails off in a single motion to leave his South Africa team-mate short by a couple of inches.Stoinis’ cross-court forehand
Stoinis, well set on 42, gave Carlos Brathewaite the charge, but was cramped for room as the bowler shortened his length to angle a bouncer on middle. The ball was getting big on Stoinis, but he went through with a one-legged flat-batted pull that sped off the blade to the boundary. The beauty of the shot was as much in his late adjustment as it was about the placement – he bisected deep midwicket and long-on perfectly.Miller makes amends
Karun Nair was batting quite comfortably, until he swiped Mohit Sharma’s slower delivery towards wide long-on in the 15th over. David Miller, running to his right from long-on, was perhaps distracted by Glenn Maxwell running to his left from deep midwicket. Maxwell backed away as soon as he heard the call of “mine”, but Miller ended up getting too close to the ball. The momentum took him forward when the ball lodged in his hands, but less than a second later it bobbled out. At that stage, Daredevils needed 51 off 31 balls.Fortunately for Kings XI, Miller redeemed himself four balls later as Nair sliced a lofted hit towards long-off. Once again, Miller sprinted in and nearly made the mistake of overrunning and was extremely close to the ball. But the height gave him an extra second to arch back and find some room as he twisted his body sideways to take that catch. A key batsman was dismissed, and Kings XI pushed ahead.

West Indies need to paper over bowling cracks

The hosts’ pace attack, with a combined experience of 31 Tests and 56 wickets, is a candidate for being their weakest ever, yet India cannot simply show up and expect to win

Karthik Krishnaswamy in Antigua20-Jul-20161:55

‘We’re expecting a bit of grass cover’ – Bangar

There are 15 champions in Dwayne Bravo’s . Four are cricketers. None are current members of West Indies’ Test team. Even little brother Darren finds no mention in the song.West Indies have won three ICC tournaments this year. Under-19 World Cup? Champions. Women’s World T20? Champions. Men’s World T20? Champions. But they haven’t won a Test series against anyone other than Bangladesh or Zimbabwe, home or away, since August 2012.West Indies’ most recent Test series ended in January. They lost 2-0, and, but for rain, could have lost 3-0. In that series, Australia ran up totals of 583 for 4 declared in Hobart, 551 for 3 declared and 179 for 3 declared in Melbourne, and 176 for 2 declared in rain-ravaged Sydney. They scored their runs at 4.67 runs per over.Champions, West Indies’ bowlers definitely were not.Simmons hopes to build on recent gains

Phil Simmons, the West Indies coach, has said the absence of four back-to-back Tests in their calendar in recent times could make it hard for his team against a formidable Indian side.
“Whether they think they are well prepared or not, they are one of the most dangerous sides in the world,” he said. “Their batting line-up alone tells you that they’re dangerous side and that it’s going to be a hard series. We haven’t played four Tests back-to-back in a long time, so that too is going to make it even harder. But we’re going to try to do our best in every Test match.”
Simmons brushed aside talk of “building a team for the future”, insisting the team was focused on the present instead.
“It’s not just about the future. It’s about now and how we play now. Every series is significant. I think it’s a case where we want to continue winning – we won the last Test match we played in the Caribbean against England, and then we had a couple of Test matches against Australia in which we didn’t do well, we went to Australia, so now we want to just try and build on what we’d been trying to do in Australia, the last two Test matches in Australia were not as bad as how we started, so we’re looking to build on that.”

Above the dressing rooms at the Sir Vivian Richards Stadium in Antigua runs a strip of sans-serif capital letters. Sir Andy Roberts End, it says. At the opposite side of the ground, above the press box, is another strip of capital letters. Sir Curtly Ambrose End.Between them, those two took 607 wickets in 145 Tests at a combined average of 22.53, with 33 five-wicket hauls and five ten-wicket match hauls.On Thursday, when West Indies begin a four-Test home series against India, their squad will contain four fast bowlers with a total of 56 wickets in 31 Tests at a combined average of 40.39, and not a single five-wicket haul.West Indies have lost Jerome Taylor to Test retirement, and have ignored Kemar Roach. While both were abject in Australia – they combined for two wickets an average of 252.00, and gave away 5.79 runs per over – no team can easily replace a new-ball pair with 252 wickets and the experience of 83 Tests, even a pair as capricious, frustrating and injury-prone as Taylor and Roach.Fast bowlers win or lose Test matches, and West Indies enter their latest home season with a pace attack that is a candidate for being their weakest ever: Carlos Brathwaite, Shannon Gabriel, Jason Holder and Miguel Cummins.It isn’t as if West Indies don’t have other issues. They have dropped a wicketkeeper-batsman with 74 Tests behind him, and – Kraigg Brathwaite and Darren Bravo aside – have a top order full of question marks, the biggest among them hanging over the head of Marlon Samuels, who has been on a sensational run of limited-overs form of late, but hasn’t passed 20 once in his last nine Test innings.But it is the bowling that will worry them the most, coming up as it will against the quality of India’s batting line-up and pitches that are likely to be slow and demand long spells of sustained pressure. In recent times, West Indies’ bowlers have not been particularly good at delivering those kinds of spells.”One of the words that we’re going to harp on a lot is how patient we are, because we tend to get bored of bowling [at] one place and doing well and not getting wickets, so we try something [else],” their head coach Phil Simmons said on Tuesday. “So we’re going to harp on this, trying to be patient and do the things that we’re doing well, continuously, so that we get the wickets, and same thing with batting. You bat long and you stick around, you work hard and you’ll get the just reward at the end.”Two days before the first Test, the West Indies team management tried to hammer this point home in the design of their net session. The quick bowlers’ net had an extra stump in it, nailed down on a fifth-stump line a couple of feet behind the wicket. Right through the net session, the only thing the fast bowlers attempted to do was bowl in the channel outside off stump, and the batsmen facing them tried to leave as many balls as they could. The wall of netting behind the batsmen shook violently, again and again and again. Every now and then, the fifth stump went for a spin.The effort was real, and palpable, but translating that sort of discipline into an actual match environment is a challenge of an entirely different magnitude. It will only take one bad session to remind West Indies that they are the eighth-best Test team of the nine that make up the rankings, and that they occupy that lowly spot at a time when there is talk of splitting Test cricket into two tiers.These are not good times for West Indies Test cricket, and the road uphill is steep.For all that, India cannot simply show up and expect to win. They won their last two Test series in the Caribbean, in 2006 and 2011, but only by 1-0 margins, and both those series reinforced their long-held status as a team that has always struggled away from home, seldom asserting their dominance even against weaker opposition. The last Test match they played in these islands, in Dominica, summed it up perfectly: the captains shook hands and agreed to a draw when India needed 86 runs to win, in 15 overs, with seven wickets in hand. India were content with a 1-0 win.”India,” began ESPNcricinfo’s final-day report of the Test match, “will have to wait until 2016 to win more than one Test in a series in the Caribbean – a feat they’ve never achieved.”India’s Test captain Virat Kohli, still fairly new at his job, is an ambitious man. So is their new head coach. They will want a series win, first and foremost, regardless of the margin, but they have surely set their sights a little higher than that.

A tale of two Pakistan-born legspinners

The contrasting careers of Imran Tahir and Mansoor Amjad, and the fewest wickets lost in an ODI series

Steven Lynch21-Jun-2016Zimbabwe took only three Indian wickets during the recent ODIs. Was this a record for a three-match series? asked Haresh Sukhraj from Canada

India lost only three wickets in the recent series – one in the first match, two in the second and none in the third – as they walloped Zimbabwe 3-0 in Harare. This is indeed a record low for a completed three-match series: the previous fewest wickets lost was seven, by South Africa in Bangladesh in March 2008, when they won the first game by nine wickets and the other two by seven. Zimbabwe lost just six wickets in three matches against Kenya at home in December 2002, but the third of those games was washed out with Zimbabwe 17 for 1. Australia lost only eight wickets – six in one game – in winning 3-0 in Zimbabwe in October 1999.Zimbabwe upset India in a T20I the other day. Have they beaten all the major countries in the format now? asked Khaya Winston from Zimbabwe

Well, Zimbabwe had already beaten India in a T20I – to square the series in Harare last year. But Zimbabwe are still awaiting their first T20 victories over England (who they have met only once), New Zealand (six matches), Pakistan (nine), South Africa (three), Sri Lanka (three) … and Afghanistan (five). But Zimbabwe do boast a 100% record against Australia, having won their only encounter, in Cape Town during the inaugural World T20 in 2007. In all Zimbabwe have won 13 of their 52 T20Is: the other victories have come against Bangladesh (four), Canada, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Scotland, UAE and West Indies. They also played out a tie against Canada in King City in October 2008, but won the bowl-out.Jonny Bairstow completed 50 dismissals in his tenth Test as the designated wicketkeeper. Has anyone got there quicker? asked Bob Rothwell from Australia

The only other man to reach 50 dismissals in his tenth Test behind the stumps is another who faced criticism over his glovework early in his career: Mark Boucher also reached the landmark in his tenth match, but kept in one fewer innings – 17 to Bairstow’s 18. Adam Gilchrist took 11 Tests (21 innings) to reach his half-century, while Courtney Browne and Dave Richardson both took 12 (and 20). Gilchrist edged the race to three figures, reaching 100 dismissals in his 22nd Test to Boucher’s 23, and was also fastest to 200 (47 Tests, with Brad Haddin next on 50).Mansoor Amjad took three wickets in his only over in T20Is but was never picked by Pakistan for the format ever again•AFPWas Imran Tahir the first South African bowler to take seven wickets in a one-day international? asked Jamie Stewart from Canada

Imran Tahir’s 7 for 45 against West Indies in St Kitts last week were the best ODI figures for South Africa, beating Kagiso Rabada’s 6 for 16 on debut against Bangladesh in Mirpur last July. There have been only eight other seven-wicket hauls in ODIs – plus Chaminda Vaas’s format-best 8 for 19 for Sri Lanka against Zimbabwe in Colombo in December 2001. For the full list, click here.Imran Tahir is the fastest South African bowler to take 100 wickets in one-day internationals. But who was the fastest of all to reach that milestone? asked David Ferrier from Belgium

Legspinner Imran Tahir (born in Pakistan) passed 100 wickets in ODIs during his 7 for 45 against West Indies in St Kitts last week. It was his 58th match, so he just pipped Morne Morkel’s previous South African record of 59. Three bowlers have reached three figures in fewer matches: Brett Lee of Australia got there in 55 games, and New Zealander Shane Bond in 54 – but the quickest of all was the Pakistan offspinner Saqlain Mushtaq, who took his 100th wicket in his 53rd ODI. Saqlain is also the quickest in terms of time – he took 592 days to reach three figures, the best part of a year quicker than Irfan Pathan (832 days). Tahir took more than five years to reach 100, well down the overall list in 44th place: the fastest South African by time remains Shaun Pollock, in just over three years (1173 days, seventh overall), but 68 matches.Who took three wickets in his only over of a T20I – and never played again? asked Arjun Krishna Murthy from India

This unfortunate bowler was the Sialkot legspinner Mansoor Amjad, who played in Pakistan’s one-off T20I against Bangladesh in Karachi in April 2008. Brought on for the 16th over, he dismissed Mahmudullah with his second ball, Mashrafe Mortaza with his fifth, and Shahadat Hossain with his sixth. That wrapped up the match – and poor Amjad was never selected again, despite finishing with the eye-catching figures of 1-0-3-3. He did make a solitary one-day international appearance a couple of months later, taking 1 for 44 in his ten overs against Sri Lanka in Karachi, but never appeared in a Test. He had also played for Leicestershire in 2006 and 2007.Send in your questions using our feedback form.

A short history of the IPL business

A new book chronicles the league’s off-field progress over its nine seasons and offers a strong argument for why India needs laws to deal with sporting fraud

Suhrith Parthasarathy16-Jul-2016″I am extremely proud that whatever we have seen over the last 44 days is a product of India,” said the president of the BCCI, Sharad Pawar, after the final of the IPL’s inaugural edition in 2008. At that point it was perhaps not immediately evident that the league’s bedrock wasn’t strong enough for it to continue to instil in its organisers a sense of pride. Indeed, over the course of eight further seasons, the IPL’s regression – via controversies both on and off the field, and deeply entrenched conflicts of interest – has been so complete that in spite of maintaining a sense of legitimacy amongst its participants, it has increasingly, for at least some of the public, become synonymous with all that is wrong with modern-day cricket.Amid the hullabaloo, though, it has been undeniable that the IPL has had a deep impact on cricket as a sport and as a business. And it’s the latter aspect that , the Delhi-based sports lawyer Desh Gaurav Sekhri’s book, seeks to concentrate on.Thus far, in spite of the fact that in just nine seasons the IPL has transformed the way we view cricket, we haven’t had a detailed account, of any reasonable length, chronicling its story. In to sport.For those undoubting of the IPL’s contribution to sport, as to those more sceptical of its inherent values, Sekhri’s book offers a useful reminder of the facts that underscore the various arguments.Not Out! The Incredible Story of the Indian Premier League
By Desh Gaurav Sekhri
Viking
256 pages, Rs 330

Game
Register
Service
Bonus